|
|
THE QUIVIRA COALITION...
Environmentalists and cowboys are building bridges in the grazing
debate.
The Quivira Coalition was founded by a rancher and two conservationists
on June 11, 1997. It is a nonprofit organization dedicated to
bringing ranchers, environmentalists, public land managers, and
other members of the public together and demonstrating to them
that ecologically healthy rangeland and economically robust ranches
can be compatible.
© 1998 by Courtney White and Jim Winder. |
|
For a copy of the current issue
call 1-800-RANGE-4-U.
|
Inviting reasonable people to listen to new ideas about ranching
and ecology. By Courtney White, conservationist.
"Courtney, the Berlin Wall fell down up here." These are the words
Forest Service District Ranger Crocket Dumas used to describe
the results of a workshop co-hosted by the Quivira Coalition in
Penasco, N.M., last June. He was referring to the wall between
ranchers and environmentalists in the region.
What did the Quivira Coalition do to bring down this "Berlin
Wall"? Nothing more than invite reasonable people to a meeting,
encourage them to listen to some new ideas about ranching an
ecology, and give them a chance to respond. We also took a walk
through the woods, literally, to see what land looks like in real
life.
During the workshop, a scientist told the audience what the
ranchers already knew, that 50 percent of forest grasslands have
disappeared over the last 50 years in northern New Mexico, mostly
due to the proliferation of piñon pines and junipers. Fire, he
said, was the key to restoring grass. His research detailed how
low-intensity fires burned the forest every seven to 15 years
historically. The future of ranching, he concluded, is tied to
returning forests to ecological health.
A conservationist told the audience that he was ready to lend
a hand. His organization had purchased a grazing allotment on
Rowe Mesa and was offering it as a grass bank for local ranchers.
Cattle would be moved up on the Mesa for three years while home
allotments underwent prescribed burning to knock back the invading
piñon-juniper forest. The ranchers, in other words, will stay
in business while the environment is being restored.
A week later the ranchers of the Santa Barbara allotment agreed
to try the grass bank.
What is the Quivira Coalition?
The Quivira Coalition was founded by a rancher and two conservationists
on June 11, 1997. It is a nonprofit organization dedicated to
bringing ranchers, environmentalists, public land managers and
other members of the public together and demonstrating to them
that ecologically healthy rangeland and economically robust ranches
can be compatible.
Our mission is to define the core issues of the grazing conflict
and to articulate a new position based on common interests and
common sense. We call this position the New Ranch.
Coalition members believe that ranchers and environmentalists
share too much in common to keep fighting-love of land, for example,
and a desire to experience solitude and beauty. Since ranchers
play a critical role in the protection of our wide open spaces,
we believe we should be allies fighting the spread of urban sprawl,
which threatens the health of the ecosystem and the vitality of
ranching.
We believe the future of the West depends on our ability to
shake hands and get to work toward our common goals.
The Quivira Coalition is promoting the principles of the New
Ranch through newsletters, workshops, outdoor classrooms, management
demonstration projects, videos, publications, site tours, community
meetings and other educational forums. We are also bringing "third
party" independence to the job of collecting scientific data.
Our aim is to build bridges between all reasonable people involved
in the grazing debate. Cooperation, collaboration and new ideas
hold the key to the future of ranching and rangelands in the Southwest.
Ecological and economic health can exist simultaneously -- it
is not a theory, it already exists. It is simply a matter of spreading
the news.
Macho Creek
A good example of the Quivira Coalition's mission can be found
on Macho Creek, near Deming, N.M. In cooperation with the State
Land Office, the ranching permittee, Quail Unlimited, and the
USDA's Jornada Experimental Range, nearly three miles of heavily
grazed riparian area along Macho Creek were isolated by electric
fence. The permittee has agreed to switch his management to dormant
season use in the creek bottom.
Scientists from the Jornada Experimental Range will closely
monitor what happens next. If things go as expected, environmental
vitality should blossom along the creek in a short time. This
will be good news for wildlife, which depend on riparian areas
for life. It will also be good news for the rancher, who will
get increased forage for his wintertime grazing.
Everyone wins. The land heals and is restored to ecological
health; the rancher benefits economically; the hunters will find
more quail; the State Land Office can earn more revenue for New
Mexico's schoolchildren; downstream neighbors will enjoy more
abundant and higher quality water; and the Quivira Coalition gets
to scientifically quantify the results.
And it was all accomplished cooperatively -- without a single
lawsuit!
Macho Creek will challenge many preconceptions, however. To
environmentalists who believe that grazing cattle is antithetical
to rangeland health, our project will be considered heresy. To
ranchers who refuse to give up continuous, year-round grazing,
our project will be eyed with suspicion. To all the defenders
of the status quo, Macho Creek will be considered to be rather
radical.
That's all right. We are part of what we call the "Radical
Center" -- the only place where the answers to the grazing debate
will be found.
As author Wendell Berry wrote: "You cannot save the land apart
from the people or the people apart from the land. To save either,
you must save both." The Quivira Coalition will strive energetically
to do exactly that.
* * *
For more information contact Courtney White, executive director,
at
505-820-2544 or send a letter to the Quivira Coalition, 551 Cordova
Rd., Suite #423, Santa Fe, NM 87501. E-mail: wldwst@rt66.com. FAX: 505-466-4035.
...AND THE NEW RANCH.
Although we win most battles, we are losing the war. We are not
losing to the environmentalists, we are losing to the economics
and demographics. By Jim Winder, rancher.
It is in the best interests of ranchers to join with environmentalists
to solve conflicts in ways which enhance both biodiversity and
economic stability.
These are tough times for ranchers. The economic fundamentals
of ranching are poor. Economists consider the beef industry to
be mature, meaning that growth is slow and price competition is
extreme. Since economic pressure has put ranchers' backs to the
wall, it is no wonder that we fight so hard when confronted by
environmentalists and government agencies.
Seems to me that we have always been fighting one battle or
another; drought, fire, Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service,
Sierra Club. In fact, we have become pretty good at fighting,
even supporting professional fighters among our ranks.
Losing the war
Although we win most battles, we are losing the war. We are not
losing to the environmentalists, we are losing to the economics
and demographics. Leadership must come from those of us with cut
hands and skinned knuckles who know in our hearts that things
must change -- that maintaining the status quo means eventual
bankruptcy.
What can be done! Well, we can use stumbling blocks for stepping
stones. If we embrace change we will find that our enemies can
be our friends and the threats will become the very opportunities
which will keep the land in the family for another generation.
Our problems are economic not political. If the American public
ever sweeps us off the land it will be because we are not producing
enough value for society, not for some hidden political agenda.
The solution is to roll our sleeves up, quit moaning about the
environmentalists and get to work.
We are not the first industry to face maturity and not all
mature industries have to die. If we are smart, we will study
what other industries have done in similar situations and learn
a lesson from the survivors on how to innovate and prosper. Each
of us should take a long hard look at the facts of the situation,
not the rhetoric spewed by opposing camps, and then seek the changes
which will ensure not just our survival, but our prosperity.
Why don't environmentalists just leave us alone?
Perhaps the best starting place is to understand why it is that
the environmentalists don't go away and, in fact, seem to be gathering
strength. The quick answer is that they are right, at least partly
so. The damage the environmentalists bemoan has in fact occurred
and continues to occur, though perhaps not to the extent claimed.
In the 1800s, the livestock cultural practices used in New
Mexico were based on those from the more temperate Eastern states.
We know today that what is good management in high rainfall areas
is disastrous to semi-desert rangelands. As early as 1899, Jared
Smith discussed a 40 percent loss of grazing capacity in Southwestern
rangelands. In 1908, E.Q. Wooton surveyed New Mexico ranchers
and found that of the 118 stockmen reporting, 102 (86 percent)
believed the carrying capacity of the ranges had diminished. Of
these, 69 believed the diminution was due to overstocking and
33 to drought.
Earlier this century, public concern over the loss of productive
capacity from rangelands brought about a massive governmental
effort to reverse the trend. Millions of dollars have been spent
through agencies like the Soil Conservation Service on land restoration
treatments such as brush and erosion control. The positive results
of this effort have led to claims that rangelands today are in
better shape than they have been for a century.
The trouble is that these claims are based on yardsticks that
value plants for their use to livestock and not on biodiversity.
What the rancher sees as success, the environmentalist sees as
failure. Increasingly, the American public requires more of their
rangelands than fat cows -- these lands need to produce clean
water, habitat for wildlife and natural beauty. When held up against
these measurements, we find that rangeland managers are falling
short.
The future is bright
Ten years ago I realized that my business was slowly spiraling
downward. Those same management techniques which had served my
family well for generations were failing me, and the harder I
worked, the faster I went broke. Things got to the point where
my banker wouldn't even give me a free cap anymore because he
said I was a bad advertisement. Slowly, and painfully, I came
to grips with the economic reality of our industry and set out
to find a solution that might keep the ranch in the family for
a few more generations.
The solution was to broaden my horizons, to become a resource
manager and to make friends out of the same environmentalists
my neighbors saw as enemies. Let me say that the hardest part
was just deciding to change. Once that decision was made, I found
support from other ranchers who had turned the corner before me.
I gained the clarity needed to grow my business four-fold in 10
years and to reach out to the environmental community for consensus,
which has given me stability on public lands.
If you are serious about continuing in or even entering into
ranching, it is time to chuck the ways of your grandfather and
to find new partners in unique places. It is not easy to change,
but there is comfort in knowing that you are not the first. Many
others have pioneered this trail and are willing to show you the
way. Ranchers have everything to gain from the Quivira Coalition
and nothing to lose.
* * *
Jim Winder ranches near Nutt, N.M. he can be reached at <jrwinder@aol.com>
|